2 posts tagged “audiobooks”
There was just an article in the New York Times -- "Your Cheatin' Listenin' Ways" by Andrew Adam Newman -- about audiobooks and the controversy around them. More than having anything to say about it, I thought I'd share the link because it pertains to this blog's general subject.
I posted my initial thoughts on audiobooks after listening to Water for Elephants a few months ago, and I have an even stronger opinion of them now. I don't buy into the idea that listening to books on tape (or CD, or iPods, or whatever) is necessarily "cheating."
Well. Now that I've got myself all worked up about it, I'm going to try to compile a list of my own, personal, pros and cons.
Pros
- Audiobooks are excellent for multitasking. For me, this usually means listening while a) shelving books for my job at the library, b) doing other solitary tasks involving hands, like cleaning, knitting and (hah!) "working out," or c) just walking around campus. The third one's really rare, because I hate the antisocial implications of someone walking around plugged in.
- They give you a feel for a book otherwise unattainable. (At this point in the list I realize that I'm probably not the best person to be making it, having listened to only one book. But whatever. Too late.) This is especially true -- I suppose, anyway -- if the narrator's a good one.
- All foreign, slash would-be foreign but really just intelligent words you don't know, are pronounced correctly.
- They're easy.
Cons
- As Mariam once pointed out to me, they lack the great, inimitable effect of real, tangible paper and ink. You can't flip through and read the table of contents and admire the cover when you're bored. And you can't go back and reread your favorite parts half as easily.
- For me, a big one is I can't write in them. I have a constant fear of forgetting things -- not just things, like dates and names, but thoughts, my own thoughts. It's why I have so many blogs and journals and a big part of why I take notes in books. For this reason, even though I have 11 more audiobooks to pick up from Audible, I have a really hard time deciding what books to listen to, because I'm afraid it'll have such a big impact that I'll regret not being able to annotate. I know. This con is nerdtastic lykwoah.
- They do encroach on the Imagination Territory a little. As I said before, not nearly so much as movies and other adaptations based on books, but still. Voices and accents count for something.
- When other people tell you they've listened to a book you spent hard-earned time and concentration actually reading, you get miffed. It's 'cause they're easy.
Uhh. So, I got pretty much nowhere with those lists, but whatever. Audiobooks are no replacement for "real" reading, but people who use them aren't cheaters. Guess what! All the words, printed or spoken, are the same. You're not necessarily any smarter for reading a book as opposed to listening to it; it just shows that you can read.
After all: in a perfect world, words, whether taken in by the ears or the eyes, should be processed the same way, so what's the difference?
I think the stigma surrounding audio-reading is basically just nostalgia. People don't like the idea of doing something so institutionalized, so dependable, in any other way. My own reservations about it have to do with this, as do, I'm pretty sure, most arguments attacking it.
This discussion excludes, of course, abridged books. That is a different topic altogether and yo, I'm not in the mood. :)
What's your stance on audiobooks?
It was a fun read, or listen, or whatever. The story is cute and touching, predictable and pleasantly surprising at the same time. The two narrators did a good job in their own characters (young and old Jacob) as well as those around them; it definitely set a different tone to the story than if I had been reading it myself.
An argument against audiobooks I've heard is that it takes away your control as a reader, your imagination's ability to shape and create characters the way it would if you were reading it on paper. The stance puts books on tape (the term seems so appropriate now, years after the tape itself is nearly defunct) under the same umbrella as movies based on books. While the inital remonstrance holds true, I disagree with the latter categorization, because I think audiobooks are really a lot closer to reading the books themselves. Sure, you eventually get used to the voices and accents of each character and shape your ideas around them, but still--at least for me--it's easy to visualize their words in your head and imagine the different ways it could have been done. Maybe it worked so well for this because a) it's my first audiobook, so I'm still not very used to it, and b) its storyline isn't so complicated that I have to focus on every detail with no room for contemplation. I don't know.
The grade: A-. A good light summer read, recommended.
Neighborhood
Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.
